Nuevas tecnologías y victimización sexual de menores por online grooming

  1. Carolina Villacampa Estiarte 1
  2. María Jesús Gómez Adillón 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Lleida
    info

    Universitat de Lleida

    Lleida, España

    ROR https://ror.org/050c3cw24

Revista:
Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología

ISSN: 1695-0194

Ano de publicación: 2016

Número: 18

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología

Resumo

It is considered that the widespread use of information technologies has led to an increase of sexual victimization of children. According to this opinion, not confirmed here, behaviours like online sexual solicitation of children, usually engaged by adults who are offline unknown by the victimized children, would be more common nowadays than they were in the recent past. In this paper we show the results of a quantitative research carried out with a sample of 489 secondary school students in Catalonia. As well as determining the child victimization rate through this type of conducts, the victim and offender profile is also established. Along with this, the dynamic of these processes, the victim-offender interaction and the degree of impact that these conducts have on victims and the way in which the situation is ended are analysed as well.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACPI/Defensor del Menor de la Comunidad de Madrid/Protégeles (2002). Seguridad Infantil y costumbres de los menores en Internet. Disponible en http://protegeles.com/docs/estudio_internet.pdf.
  • Bocij, P./McFarlane, L. (2003), The internet: a discussion of some new and emerging threats to Young people. The Police Journal, 76, 3-13.
  • Carrasco, J. L./Hernán, M. A. (1993). Estadística multivariante en las ciencias de la vida. Madrid: Editorial Ciencia.
  • Davidson, J,/Gottschalk, P. (2011). Conclusion. En Davidson, J,/Gottschalk, P. (Eds.), Internet Child Abuse. Current Research and Policy. London: Routledge.
  • Davidson, J/Martellozzo, E. (2008). Protecting Vulnerable Young People in Cyberspace from Sexual Abuse: Raising Awareness and Responding Globally. Police Investigations Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 2008, 9 (4), 277-289.
  • Duncan, S. H. (2007-2008). MySpace Is Also Their Space: Ideas for Keeping Children Safe from Sexual Predators on Social-Networking Sites. Kentucky Law Journal, 96, 527-577.
  • Finkelhor, D./Mitchell, K. J./Wolak, J. (2000). Online Victimization: A Report on the Nation’s Youth. Disponible en http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Victimization_Online_Survey.pdf.
  • Fox, J.A/ Levin, J./ Forde, D.R. (2009). Elementary Statistics in Criminal Justice Research. Boston: Pearson Education, 3rd Edition.
  • Garmendia, M./Garitaonandia, C./Martínez, G./Casado, M.A. (2011). Riesgos y seguridad en Internet: los menores españoles en el contexto europeo. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco. Disponible en http://www.prentsa.ehu.es/p251content/es/contenidos/noticia/20110328_internet_kids/es_interkid/adjuntos/Informe_Espa %C3%B1a_completo_red.pdf.
  • Groppe, J.S. (2007-2008). A child’s Playground or a Predators Hunting Ground?How to Protect Children on Internet Social Networking Sites. Comm. Law Conspectus, 16, 215248.
  • Hamilton, M. (2011-12). The Child Pornography Crusade and Its Net-Widening Effect. Cardozo Law Review, 33,1679-1732.
  • Haubenreich, S. (2008-2009). Parental Rights in Myspace: Reconceptualizing the State’s Parens Patriae Role in the Digital Age. Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J., 31, p. 223-256.
  • Hosmer, D.W./Lemeshow, S. (1992). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
  • Hughes, D.M. (2002). The use of New Communications and Information Techonologies for Sexual Exploitation of Women and Children. Hastings Women’s Law Journal, 13, 127-146.
  • Livingstone, S./Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: final report 2009. London: EU Kids Online Network. Disponible en http://eprints.Ise.ac.uk/24372/.
  • Lööf, L. (2012). Sexual behaviour, adolescents and problematic content. En Quayle, E./Ribisl, K.M (Eds.), Understanding and Preventing Online Sexual Exploitation of Children. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Martellozzo, E. (2012). Online Child Sexual Abuse. Grooming, Policing and Child Protection in a Multi-Media World. London: Routledge.
  • McAlinden, A.M. (2012). “Grooming” and the Sexual Abuse of Children. Institutional, Internet and Familial Dimensions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Miró Linares, F. (2011). La oportunidad criminal en el ciberespacio. Aplicación y desarrollo de la teoría de las actividades cotidianas para la prevención del cibercrimen. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología. 13-07, 07:1-07:55.
  • Mitchell. K.J./Jones, L./Finkelhor, D./Wolak, J. (2014). Trends in Unwanted Sexual Solicitations: Findings from the Youth Internet Safety Studies. Disponible en http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Sexual%20Solicitation%201%20of%204%20YISS%20B ulletins%20Feb%202014.pdf.
  • Myers, R. H. (1989). Classical and modern regression with applications. Boston: PWSKENT.
  • Ost, S. (2009). Child pornography and sexual grooming. Legal and Societal Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pereda, N./Abad, J./Guilera, G. (2013) Victimización de menores a través de Internet: descripción y características de las victimas del online grooming”. En Delito, Pena, Política Criminal y Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en las modernas ciencias penales. Salamanca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Pérez López, C. (2005). Métodos Estadísticos Avanzados con SPPS. Madrid: Thomson.
  • Stedman, E.P. (2007). Myspace, but whose responsibility?. Liabitity of Social-Networking Websites when offline sexual assault of minors follows online interaction. Villanova Sports & Ent. Law Journal, 14, 363-397.
  • Taylor, J., (2001). Policing social networking sites and online grooming. En Davidson, J./Gottschalk, P. (Eds.), Internet Child Abuse. Current Research and Policy. London: Routledge.
  • Van der Heide, S. (2008-2009). Social Networking and Sexual Predators: the case of SelfRegulation. Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J., 31, 173-191.
  • Villacampa Estiarte, C. (2014). Propuesta sexual telemática a menores u online child grooming: configuración presente del delito y perspectivas de modificación. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, 34, 639-712.
  • Villacampa Estiarte, C. (2015). El delito de online child grooming o propuesta sexual telemática a menores. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Webster, S./Davidson, J./Bifulco, A./Gottschalk, P./Caretti, V./Pham, T./Grove-Hills, J./Turley, C./Tompkins, C./Ciulla, S./Milazzo, V./Schimmenti, A./Craparo, G. (2012). European Online Grooming Project. Final Report. Disponible en http://www.europeanonlinegroomingproject.com/wp-content/file-uploads/EuropeanOnline-Grooming-Project-Final-Report.pdf.
  • Whitaker, J.L./Bushman, B.J. (2009). Online Dangers: Keeping Children and Adolescents Safe. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 66, 1053-1063.
  • Wolak, J./Finkelhor, D. (2011). Sexting: a Typology. Disponible en http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV231_Sexting%20Typology%20Bulletin_4-611_revised.pdf.
  • Wolak, J./Mitchell, K.J./Finkelhor, D., Online Victimization of Youth. Five Years Later, 2006. Disponible en http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV138.pdf.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet