The study of character strengths and life satisfaction: A comparison between affective-component and cognitive-component traits

  1. Ana Blasco-Belled 1
  2. Carles Alsinet 1
  3. Cristina Torrelles-Nadal 1
  4. Agnès Ros-Morente 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Lleida, España
Revista:
Anuario de psicología

ISSN: 0066-5126

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 48

Número: 3

Páginas: 75-80

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANPSIC.2018.10.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de psicología

Resumen

La literatura científica demuestra que las fortalezas de carácter predicen altos niveles de satisfacción vital. El presente estudio pretende examinar la relación entre estos 2 constructos, pero de un modo más específico. Para ello, hicimos uso de la clasificación mente versus corazón de las fortalezas de carácter (Peterson, 2006), escasamente utilizada en estudios previos, para analizar si los rasgos de componente afectivo (fortalezas de corazón) se relacionan en mayor medida con la satisfacción vital que los rasgos con componente cognitivo (fortalezas de mente). Cuatrocientos diecinueve estudiantes universitarios completaron las 2 medidas requeridas. Los resultados demuestran que los rasgos de componente afectivo predicen la satisfacción vital en mayor medida que los rasgos de componente cognitivo. Este hallazgo destaca la necesidad de crear intervenciones basadas en las fortalezas de carácter para mejorar los niveles de satisfacción vital, poniendo especial énfasis en las fortalezas de corazón. Se comentan las implicaciones que suponen para futuras investigaciones en el campo del bienestar.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abasimi, E., Gai, X., Wang, G., Character strengths and life satisfaction of high school students. International Journal of Applied Psychology 7:2 (2017), 36–43, 10.5923/j.ijap.20170702.02.
  • Atienza, F.L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., García-Merita, M.L., Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents. Psicothema 12 (2000), 314–319, 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X.
  • Azañedo, C.M., Fernández-Abascal, E.G., Barraca, J., Character strengths in Spain: Validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish sample. Clínica y Salud 25:2 (2014), 123–130, 10.1016/j.clysa.2014.06.002.
  • Brdar, I., Kashdan, T.B., Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality 44:1 (2010), 151–154, 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.
  • Brdar, I., Anić, P., Rijavec, M., Character strengths and well-being: Are there gender differences? The human pursuit of well-being. 2011, Springer, Netherlands, 145–156.
  • Busseri, M.A., Sadava, S.W., A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and social psychology review 15:3 (2011), 290–314, 10.1177/1088868310391271.
  • Casas, F., Fernández-Artamendi, S., Montserrat, C., Bravo, A., Bertrán, I., Valle, J.F.D., El bienestar subjetivo en la adolescencia: Estudio comparativo de dos Comunidades Autónomas en España. Anales de Psicología 29:1 (2013), 148–158, 10.6018/analesps.29.1.145281.
  • Cummins, R.A., Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research 64:2 (2003), 225–256, 10.1023/A:1024712527648.
  • Diener, E., Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 2000, 34, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., Arora, R., Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(1), 2010, 52, 10.1037/a0018066.
  • Donaldson, S.I., Dollwet, M., Rao, M.A., Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. Journal of Positive Psychology 10:3 (2015), 185–195, 10.1080/17439760.2014.943801.
  • Douglass, R.P., Duffy, R.D., Strengths use and life satisfaction: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 16:3 (2015), 619–632, 10.1007/s10902-014-9525-4.
  • Eid, M., Diener, E., Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social indicators research 65:3 (2004), 245–277 doi:B:SOCI.0000003801.89195.bc.
  • Forgeard, M.J.C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M.L., Seligman, M.E.P., Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing 1:1 (2011), 79–106, 10.5502/ijw.v1i1.15.
  • Haridas, S., Bhullar, N., Dunstan, D.A., What's in character strengths? Profiling strengths of the heart and mind in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences 113 (2017), 32–37, 10.1007/978-94-007-1375-8_13.
  • Hausler, M., Strecker, C., Huber, A., Brenner, M., Höge, T., Höfer, S., Distinguishing relational aspects of character strengths with subjective and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2017, 1159, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01159.
  • Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M.J.C., Seligman, M.E.P., The engine of well- being. Review of General Psychology 16:4 (2012), 327–342, 10.1037/a0027990.
  • Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., Kashdan, T.B., Examining the effect of affect on life satisfaction judgments: A within-person perspective. Journal of Research in Personality 68 (2017), 32–37, 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.005.
  • Keyes, C.L.M., Shmotkin, D., Ryff, C.D., Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002), 1007–1022, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.
  • Layard, R., Happiness: Lessons from a new science. 2011, Penguin, London, UK.
  • Littman-Ovadia, H., Lavy, S., Differential ratings and associations with well-being of character strengths in two communities. Health Sociology Review 21:3 (2012), 299–312, 10.5172/hesr.2012.21.3.299.
  • Littman-Ovadia, H., Steger, M., Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA inventory of strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28 (2012), 41–50, 10.1027/1015-5759/a000089.
  • Martínez-Martí, M.L., Ruch, W., Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 2014, 1253, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.
  • Martínez-Martí, M.L., Ruch, W., Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology 12:2 (2017), 110–119, 10.1080/17439760.2016.1163403.
  • Park, N., Peterson, C., Positive psychology and character strengths: Application to strengths-based school counseling. Professional School Counseling 12:2 (2008), 85–92, 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.85.
  • Park, N., Peterson, C., Seligman, M.E.P., Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23 (2004), 603–619, 10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.
  • Pavot, W., Diener, E., The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology 3 (2008), 137–152, 10.1080/17439760701756946.
  • Peterson, C., A primer in positive psychology. 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., Positive psychology as the evenhanded positive psychologist views it. Psychological Inquiry 14 (2003), 141–146.
  • Peterson, C., Seligman, M.E.P., Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., Seligman, M.E., Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology 2:3 (2007), 149–156, 10.1080/17439760701228938.
  • Proyer, R.T., Gander, F., Wyss, T., Ruch, W., The relation of character strengths to past, present, and future life satisfaction among German-Speaking women. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being 3:3 (2011), 370–384, 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01060.x.
  • Ruch, W., Proyer, R.T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., Seligman, M.E.P., Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences 31:3 (2010), 138–149, 10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.
  • Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology 52:1 (2001), 141–166, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
  • Ryff, C.D., Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1989, 1069, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
  • Ryff, C.D., Singer, B., Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (2008), 13–39, 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
  • Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology 7 (1999), 61–84.
  • Seligman, M.E.P., Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Snyder, C.R., Lopez, S.J., (eds.) Handbook of positive psychology, 2002, Oxford University Press, New York, 3–9.
  • Seligman, M.E., Steen, T.A., Park, N., Peterson, C., Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 2005, 410, 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.
  • Seligman, M.E.P., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55:1 (2000), 5–14, 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5.
  • Sin, N.L., Lyubomirsky, S., Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 65:5 (2009), 467–487, 10.1002/jclp.20593.
  • Vázquez, C., Duque, A., Hervás, G., Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. Spanish Journal of Psychology 16:e82 (2013), 1–15, 10.1017/sjp.2013.82.
  • Veenhoven, R., Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social indicators research 58:1–3 (2002), 33–46, 10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet