Applications of Heutagogy on the Educational Use of E-Portfolios

Referencias bibliográficas

• Agonács, N., & Matos, J.F. (2017). Towards a heutagogy-based MOOC design framework. Proceedings of EMOOCs 2017, May 22-26, 2017, Madrid, Spain. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1841/R01_127.pdf
• Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Lc7lx8
• Anders, A. (2015). Theories and applications of massive online open courses (MOOCs): The case for hybrid design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 39-61.
• Anderson, T. (2010). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education. Canada: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2JBwH69
• Anderson, T. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for use of social media in higher education. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(1), 6-19. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/30AZ9KB
• Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios. Educação, Formação & Tecnologias, 3(1), 6-14. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/30oQ8H2
• Barrett, H. (2006). Using electronic portfolios for formative/classroom-based assessment. Connected Newsletter. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YNnkDR
• Bernath, U., & Rubin, E. (2003). Reflections on teaching and learning in an online masers program: A case study. Oldenburg, Germany: BIS. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/30NJwzR
• Blaschke, L. M. (2019). The pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy continuum and technology-supported personal learning environments. In I. Jung (Ed.), Open and distance education theory revisited: Implications for the online era. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
• Blaschke, L.M. (2014a). Moving students forward in the PAH continuum. In L.M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning, (pp. 56-67). United States: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Retrieved from https://uol.de/coer/announcements/free-oer-now-available-experiences-in-self-determined-learning/
• Blaschke, L. M. (2014b). Using social media to engage and develop online learners in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21635
• Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 13(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
• Blaschke, L. M., & Brindley, J. (2011). Establishing a foundation for reflective practice: A case study of learning journal use. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JY71Qt
• Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2015). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating 21st century self-determined learners. In M.M. Kinshuk & B.Gros, The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
• Brandt, B. (2013). The learner’s perspective. In Hase, S., & Kenyon, C.(Eds.), Self- determined learning: Heutagogy in action. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102
• Canning, N. & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069
• Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x
• Cochrane, T., Antonczak, L., Gordon, A., Sissons, H., & Withell, A. (2012). Heutagogy and mobile social media: Post Web 2.0 pedagogy. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures. In Proceedings ascilite, Wellington 2012. (pp. 204-214).
• Cochrane, T., & Rhodes, D. (2011). iArchi(tech)ture: Heutagogical approaches to education facilitated by mlearning integration. Education and Technology: Innovation and Research. Proceedings of ICICTE 2011, pp. 112-121. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Cochrane/publication/235633454_iArchitechture_Heutagogical_Approaches_to_Education_Facilitated_by_Mlearning_Integration/links/57cf87ba08ae057987ac0f13/iArchitechture-Heutagogical-Approaches-to-Education-Facilitated-by-Mlearning-Integration.pdf
• Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world: Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York/Heidelberg: Springer.
• Davidson, E. J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: the nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• DeMers, M. (2019). Heutagogy, personal learning environments, and multi-path entry into GIS education. In H. Walkington, J. Hill, & Dyer S. (Eds.), Handbook for teaching and learning in geography. Elgaronline. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116497.00030
• Dick, B. (2013). Crafting learner-centred processes using action research and action learning. In Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.), Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic.
• Eberle, J., & Childress, M. (2009). Using heutagogy to address the needs of online learners. In P. Rogers, G.A. Berg, J.V. Boettecher, & L. Justice (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed.), (pp. 2239-2245). New York, NY: Idea Group, Inc.
• Ehlers, U-D., & Kellermann, S.A. (2019). Future skills: The future of learning and higher education. Results of the International Future Skills Delphi Survey. Karlsruhe, Germany: Baden-Wurttemberg Cooperative State University. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2WogLKv
• Ellucian.com (2019). Credential clout: How higher education can prepare for an evolving job market. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2HxKyrU
• Farrell, O., & Seery, A. (2019). “I am not simply learning and regurgitating information, I am also learning about myself”: Learning portfolio practice and online distance students. Distance Education, 40(1), 76-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553565
• Gardner, A., Hase, S., Gardner, G., Dunn, S.V., & Carryer, J. (2008). From competence to capability: A study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(2), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.206.0188.x
• Garnett, F. (2013). The PAH continuum: Pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy (Web log message). Heutagogy Community of Practice. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YFrdKY
• Gerstein, J. (2013). Education 3.0 and the pedagogy (andragogy, heutagogy) of mobile learning. (Web log message). User generated education. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/QkyU6A
• Gibbons, A. S., & Rogers, P. C. (2009). Coming at design from a different angle: Functional design. In Learning and instructional technologies for the 21st century (pp. 1-11). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Glassner, A., & Back, S. (in press, 2020). Exploring heutagogy in higher education: Academia meets the Zeitgeist. Singapore: Springer Nature.
• Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: some challenges and opportunities. Impact: Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning, 1(1), 43–52.
• Hase, S. (2011). Learner defined curriculum: heutagogy and action learning in vocational training. Southern Institute of Technology Journal of Applied Research, Special Edition on Action Research. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2wkbPrn
• Hase, S. (2014). Skills for the learner and learning leader in the 21st century. In L.M. Blaschke, C. Kenyon, & S. Hase (Eds.), Experiences in self-determined learning, (pp. 98-107). United States: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Available from https://uol.de/coer/announcements/free-oer-now-available-experiences-in-self-determined-learning/
• Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy: Implications for VET. Southern Cross University, ePublications @SCU. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2WpZZe6
• Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111-119. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QjLoLR
• Jackson, N.J. (2013). Lifewide learning, education and personal development (e-book). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/28Jc8As
• Kanwar, A.S., Balasubramanian, K., & Umar, A. (2013). Lifelong learning in South Africa. International Journal of Continuing Education & Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 17-39. Retrieved from https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=385667795117099;res=IELHSS
• Jimoyiannis, A., Schiza, E. I., & Tsiotakis, P. (2018). Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Through Online Academic Writing in a Course Blog. In D. Sampson, D. Ifenthaler, J. M. Spector, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning (pp. 111–129). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73417-0
• Jimoyiannis, A., & Tsiotakis, P. (2016). Self-directed learning in e-portfolios : Analysing students ’ performance and learning presence. EAI EA Endorsed Transactions, 3(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.10-3-2016.151120
• Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. USA: Cambridge Adult Education.
• Lederman, D. (2019, April 17). Harsh take on assessment…from assessment pros. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2GjdbYc
• Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J. & Cook, J. (2010). Learner-generated contexts: A framework to support the effective use of technology for learning. In M. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 70-84). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
• Maina, M. & Garcia, I. (2016). Articulating personal pedagogies through learning ecologies. In B. Gros, Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies (pp. 73-94). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662- 47724-3
• Marín, V. I. (2020). Research-based learning in education studies: Design inquiry using group e-Portfolios based on blogs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4523
• Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
• Maykut, C., Wilkd, C., & May, N. (2019). Heutagogy: Enacting caring science practices. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 12(11), 11-17. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2VN7BTm
• McAuliffe, M.B., Hargreaves, D.J., Winter, A.J., & Chadwick, G. (2009). Does pedagogy still rule? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2009.11464018
• McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2uIAAv0
• Mezirow, J., & Associates. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Narayan, V., Herrington, J., & Cochrane, C. (2019). Design principles for heutagogical learning: Implementing student-determined learning with mobile and social media tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3941
• OECD. (2018). The future of higher education and skills: Education 2030. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2IhJXYs
• Porto, S. (2008). E-portfolios from concept to implementation: In search of an enhanced MDE experience. Unpublished master’s thesis. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YLqdFp
• Porto, S., Blaschke, L. M., & Kurtz, G. (2011). Creating an ecosystem for life-long learning through social media: A graduate experience. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Educating educators with social media: Cutting-edge technologies in higher education series. Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.
• Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Retrieved from http://oetmanhattan.wikispaces.com/file/view/Prensky-- Teaching+Digital+Natives-in+press6.pdf
• Redecker, C. & Punie, Y. (Ed.). (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg, EU: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/159770. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2APXFm8
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009). Instructional-design theories and models, volume III: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.
• Reigeluth, C.M., & Keller, J.B. (2009). Understanding instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth & Carr-Chellmann, A.A (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, volume III: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York: Routledge.
• Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA, & New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Sangrá, A., Raffaghelli, J.E., & Guitert-Catasus, M. (2019). Learning ecologies through a lens: Ontological, methodological and applicative issues: A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1619-1638. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12795
• Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. United States: Basic Books, Inc.
• Scully, D., O’Leary, M. & Brown, M. (2018). The learning portfolio in higher education: A game of snakes and ladders. Dublin: Dublin City University, Centre for Assessment Research, Policy & Practice in Education (CARPE) and National Institute for Digital Learning (NIDL). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2EsMj7Q
• Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & de Freitas, S. (2010). Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experiences. New York and London: Routledge.
• Siemens, G. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In T. Hug (Ed) Didactics of microlearning: Concepts, discourses and examples. Munster, Germany: Waxman.
• Walti, C. (2004). The web-based portfolio and learning journal in the MDE program – Support for a work in progress. In U. Bernath & A. Szücs (Eds.), Supporting the Learner in Distance Education and E-Learning, Proceedings of the Third EDEN Research Workshop (pp. 87 - 95). Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2K55zfg
• Stephenson, J. & Weil, S. (1992), Quality in learning: A capability approach in higher education. London, UK: Kogan Page.
• Stoszkowski, J., & McCarthy, L. (2019). Students’ perceptions of the learner attributes required for (and resulting from) heutagogical learning. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 14. Retrieved from https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/458/pdf
• Tur, G., Urbina, S., & Forteza, D. (2019). Rubric-based Formative Assessment in Process Eportfolio: Towards Self-regulated Learning. Digital Education Review, 35. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2019.35.18-35
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E. M., & Hanft, A. (2011). Validation of competencies in e-portfolios: A qualitative analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i1.893