Comprensión lectora y videoanálisisevaluación de intervenciones didácticas en formación docente dual

  1. Peguera Carré, Maria Carme 1
  2. Rodríguez, Jordi L. Coiduras 1
  3. Garcia, Enric Falguera 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Lleida (España)
Journal:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 32

Issue: 4

Pages: 663-673

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.70950 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista complutense de educación

Abstract

The teaching of reading remains a major concern, especially as a competence linked to access to information and to progress in critical and autonomous learning. This article presents an investigation on the didactics of reading comprehension, as pedagogical knowledge, in a Primary Education Degree. This case study addresses the need to teach the most complex processes of reading. The exploratory research on the teaching practice with video analysis in a dual-system contains the study of 410 units. The analysis allows us to verify the adequacy of the use of video in processes with a specific orientation training for pre-service teachers (DFI). The results show the acquisition of didactic strategies and the evidence of a main difficulty: the development of a dialogue for inferential understanding and critical evaluation in the classroom. The presentation of these issues by DFIs does not always occur clearly. We therefore conclude that the designed category system is effective for evaluating the video intervention sequences in the classroom.

Bibliographic References

  • Abott, G., & Wingard, P. (1985) The Teaching of English as an international language: a practical guide. Glasgow: Collins.
  • Álvarez-Álvarez, C., & Diego-Mantecón, J. M. (2019). ¿Cómo describen, analizan y valoran los futuros maestros su formación lectora? Revista Complutense de Educación, 30(4), 1083-1096. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.60082
  • Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J. L., & Sánchez-Algarra, P. (2020). Integración de elementos cualitativos y cuantitativos en metodología observacional. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 49, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2020.i49.04
  • Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Gamoran, M., Sherin, G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for educational research online, 5(1), 90-114. https://www.waxmann.com/artikelART102716
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • Cervetti, G. (2019). Five decades of comprehension research: informing the future. Journal of literacy research, 51, 1, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X18823835
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Coiduras, J., Blanch, À. & Barbero, I. (2020). Initial teacher education in a dual-system: Addressing the observation of teaching performance. Journal: Studies in Educational Evaluation 64, 100834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100834
  • Falguera García, Enric. (2019) . Alicia en el laberinto intertextual: del hipertexto a la pantalla. Ocnos: Revista de Estudios sobre lectura, 18(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2019.18.2.1891
  • Ford, M.P. & Opitz, M.F. (2008). A National Survey of Guided Reading Practices: What We Can Learn from Primary Teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(4), 309-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802332895
  • Fumagalli, J.C., Barreyro, J.P., & Jaichenco, V.I. (2017). Fluidez lectora en niños: cuáles son las habilidades subyacentes. Ocnos, 16(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.1.1332
  • Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
  • Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 103– 128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103
  • Hornsby, D. (2000). A Closer Look at Guided Reading. Armadale: Eleanor Curtain.
  • Izquierdo-Magaldi, B., Melero Zabal, Á., & Villalón Molina, R. (2020). Actitudes y sentimiento de competencia hacia la lectura y la escritura del alumnado de 1º y 2º de Educación Primaria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(3), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.63164
  • Kersting, N., Givvin, K., Thompson, B., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Education Research Journal, 49(3), 568-589. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212437853
  • Lane, H.B., Hudson, R.F., Leite, W.L., Kosanovich, M.L., Taylor, M., Fenty, N.S., & Wright, T. (2009). Teacher knowledge about reading fluency and indicators of students' fluency growth in reading first schools. Reading and Writing Quartely, 25, 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491232
  • Melief, K., Tigchelaar, A., Korthagen, F. & van Rijswijk, M. (2010). Aprender de la práctica. En O. Esteve, K. Melief & A. Alsina (Eds.), Creando mi profesión. Una propuesta para el desarrollo profesional del profesorado (pp. 19-38). Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
  • Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
  • Peguera Carré, M.C., Curto Reverte, A., Ianos, M.A., & Coiduras Rodríguez, J.L. (2021). Evaluación de narrativas en formación dual docente: diseño y experimentación del instrumento SCAN: A case study. Revista De Investigación Educativa, 39(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.415271
  • Pennac, D. (2006). Como una novela. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Puente, A, Mendoza-Lira, M., Calderón J. F., & Zuñiga, C. (2019). Estrategias metacognitivas lectoras para construir el significado y la representación de los textos escritos. Ocnos, 18(1), 21-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2019.18.1.1781
  • Queralt, E. (2012). Llegir, més enllà de les lletres: Interioritats de didàctica de la lectura. Lleida: Pagès editors.
  • Santagata, R. (2010). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328485
  • Santagata, R. (2014). Towards ambitious teaching: using video to support future teachers reasoning about evidence of student learning. Recherche et formation, 75, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheformation.2180
  • Sherin, M.G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs, En R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Solé, I. (2006). Estrategias de lectura. Barcelona: Graó.
  • Solé, I. (2016). L'aprenentatge de la lectura en lectors debutants... i el seu ensenyament. Llengua, Societat i Comunicació, 14, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1344/LSC-2016.14.3
  • Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study. Sage Publications Limited.
  • Trigueros, M., Sandoval, I., & Lozano, M.D. (2020). Ways of acting when using technology in the primary school classroom: contingencies and possibilities for learning. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01171-9
  • Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Londres: Sage Publications.
Data source: Dialnet