El Consejo de Estadoun análisis empírico sobre los votos separados de sus consejeros

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALDER,John,«Dissents in Courts of Last Resort: A Tragic Choice», Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20, 2000, pp. 221-246.
• AMARAL-GARCIA,Sofia/GAROUPA,Nuno, «Do Administrative Courts Favor the Government? Evidence from Medical Malpractice in Spain», Journal of European Tort Law, 6, 2015, pp. 241-259.
• AMARAL-GARCIA,Sofia/GAROUPA,Nuno, «Judicial Behavior and Devolution at the Privy Council», Review of Law and Economics, 13, artículo núm. 2015-0013, 2017, pp. 1-40.
• BADER GINSBURG,Ruth, «The Role of Dissenting Opinions», Minnesota Law Review, 95, 2020, pp.1-8.
• BERZON,Marsha S., «Dissent, “Dissentals”, and Decision Making», California Law Review, 100, 2012, pp. 1479-1492.
• BRENNAN,William J.JR., «In Defense of Dissents», Hastings Law Journal, 37, 1985, pp. 427-438.
• DALLA PELLEGRINA,Lucia et al.,«Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Bi-Dimensional Courts», Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17, 2020, pp. 383-415.
• DALLA PELLEGRINA,Lucia et al., «Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The Case of Administrative Review», International Review of Law and Economics, 52, 2017, pp. 16-28.
• DAUGHETY,Andrew F./REINGANUM,Jennifer F., «Speaking Up: A Model of Judicial Dissent and Discretionary Review», Supreme Court Economic Review, 14, 2006, pp. 1-41.
• EDELMAN,Paul H. et a.l, «Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court», Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 2012, pp. 129-148.
• EDWARDS,Harry T., «The Effects of Collegiality on Judicial Decision Making», University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 2003, pp. 1639-1660.
• EPSTEIN,Lee et al., «The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court», American Journal of Political Science, 45, 2001, pp. 362-377.
• EPSTEIN,Lee et al., «Why (and When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis», Journal of Legal Analysis, 3, 2011, pp. 101-137.
• EPSTEIN, Lee et al., The Behavior of Federal Judges, Harvard University Press, 2013.
• FONT I LLOVET,Tomás, «Órganos Consultivos», Revista de Administración Pública, 108, 1985, pp. 53-86.
• FISCHMAN,Joshua, «Estimating Preferences of Circuit Judges: A Model of Consensus Voting», Journal of Law and Economics, 54, 2011, pp. 781-809.
• FISCHMAN,Joshua, «Interpreting Circuit Court Voting Patterns: A Social Interactions Framework», Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 31, 2013, pp. 808-842.
• GARCÍA ÁLVAREZ,Gerardo, «El fracaso en España del modelo francés de Consejo de Estado (1845-1904)», Documentación Administrativa, 244-245, 1996, pp. 89-133.
• GAROUPA,Nuno et al., «Political Influence and Career Judiciary: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review bythe Spanish Supreme Court», Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 2012, pp. 795-826.
• GAROUPA,Nuno et al., «Judging under Political Pressure: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review», Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29, 2013, pp. 513-534.
• GAROUPA,Nuno et al., «Disagreeing in private or dissenting in public: an empirical exploration of possible motivations», European Journal of Law and Economics,53, 2021, pp. 147-173.
• GERBER,Scott D./PARK,Keeok, «The Quixotic Search for Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Cross-judicial Empirical Analysis of the Rehnquist Court Justices», American Political Science Review, 91, 1997, pp. 390-408.
• HAIRE,Susan et al., «Diversity, Deliberations, and Judicial Opinion Writing», Journal of Law and Courts, 1, 2013, pp. 303-330.
• HANRETTY,Chris, «Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Court», European Journal of Political Research, 51, 2012, pp. 671-692.
• HARNAY,Sophie/MARCIANO,Alain, «Judicial Conformity and Dissidence: An Economic Analysis of Judicial Precedent», International Review of Law and Economics, 23, 2003, pp. 405-420.
• HETTINGER,VirginiaA. et al.,«ComparingAttitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting: Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals», American Journal of Political Science, 48, 2004, pp. 123-137.
• HURWITZ,MarkS./LANIER DREW,Noble, «"I Respectfully Dissent": Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the US Supreme Court, 1888-1999», Review of Policy Research, 21, 2004, pp. 429-445.
• IARYCZOWER,Matias/SHUM,Matthew, «The Value of Information in the Court: Get it Right, Keep it Tight», American Economic Review, 102, 2012, pp. 202-237.
• LAFFRANQUE,Julia, «Dissenting Opinion and Judicial Independence», Juridica International,8, 2003, pp.162-172.
• MCCORMICK,PeterJ., «'Was it Something I Said?' Losing the Majority on the Modern Supreme Court of Canada, 1984-2011», Osgoode Hall Law Journal,50, 2012, pp. 93-128.
• MURO, Sergioet al., «Exploring Dissent in the Supreme Court of Argentina», International Review of Law and Economics, 63, Article 105909, 2020.
• NAVARRO CABALLERO,María Teresa,«El Consejo de Estado. Origen histórico y regulación actual a la luz de la ley orgánica 3/2004, de 28 de diciembre», Anales de Derecho, Universidad de Murcia, 24, 2006, pp. 9-39.
• NAURIN,Daniel/STIANSEN,Ǿvind,«Judicial Dissent and Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights», Working paper, on file with the authors, 2017.
• NIBLETT,Anthony/YOON,Albert H., «Judicial Disharmony: A Study of Dissent», International Review of Law and Economics, 42, 2015, pp. 60-71.
• PADOVANO,Fabio, «The Time-Varying Independence of Italian Peak Judicial Institutions», Constitutional Political Economy, 20, 2009, pp. 230-250.
• PARADA VÁZQUEZ,Ramón,«El Consejo de Estado», Documentación Administrativa, 226, 1991, pp.113-128.
• RAFFAELI,Rosa, «Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member State, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs», available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies, 2012.
• SALAMONE,Michael F., «Judicial Consensus and Public Opinion: Conditional Response to Supreme Court Majority Size», Political Research Quarterly, 20, 2013, pp. 320-334.
• SANTAMARÍA PASTOR, Juan Alfonso, Principios de Derecho Administrativo General II, segunda edición, IUSTEL, Madrid, 2009.
• STACK,Kevin,«The Practice of Dissent in the Supreme Court», Yale Law Journal, 105, 1996, pp. 2235-2259.
• SUNSTEIN,CASS, «Unanimity and Disagreement on the Supreme Court», Cornell Law Review, 100, 2015, pp. 769-823.
• VERA SANTOS,José Manuel, «Cuarenta años del Consejo de Estado, o de cómo seguir siendo órgano consultivo y no morir en el intento», Revista de Derecho Político, 101, 2018, pp. 309-349.
• VITALE,David, «The Value of Dissent in Constitutional Adjudication: A Context-Specific Analysis», Review of Constitutional Studies, 19, 2014, pp. 83-108.
• WAHLBECK,PaulJ.et al., «The Politics of Dissents and Concurrences on the U.S. Supreme Court», American Politics Research, 27, 1999, pp. 488-514.
• WALKER,ThomasG.et al.,«On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court», Journal of Politics, 50, 1988, pp. 361-389.
• WOOD,Diane, «When to Hold, when to Fold, and when to Reshuffle: The Art of Decisionmaking on a Multi-member Court», California Law Review, 100, 2012, pp. 1445-1477.
• ZINK,JamesR. et al., «Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals' Views of Court Opinions», Journal of Politics, 71, 2009, pp. 909-925.