¿Por qué introducir la perspectiva interseccional en el debate teórico sobre ciudadanía intercultural?

  1. Mariona Lladonosa Latorre
  2. Özgür Güneş Öztürk
Revista:
Clivatge. Estudis i testimonis sobre el conflicte i el canvi socials

ISSN: 2014-6590

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 10

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Clivatge. Estudis i testimonis sobre el conflicte i el canvi socials

Resumen

En el contexto de las llamadas conflictividades (post)nacionales aparece el reto de configurar un modelo de ciudadanía que incorpore el eje del reconocimiento en interacción con la igualdad. El modelo intercultural es el marco en el que actualmente se está dando esta reflexión. El artículo desarrolla una aproximación teórica y crítica en torno al interculturalismo como enfoque normativo de ciudadanía. Primero, propone una introducción a las tesis que sustentan la propuesta de la ciudadanía intercultural dentro del paradigma republicanista. A continuación, a través de la discusión teórica, se plantea un análisis crítico de dos de los elementos centrales que desarrolla el enfoque intercultural: la relevancia del contacto interpersonal y el papel del espacio público como ejes de reconocimiento. Finalmente, se introduce la perspectiva interseccional para contribuir a la discusión de un marco de ciudadanía donde gane centralidad el análisis de las relaciones de dominación y las formas de desposesión estructurales de la sociedad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison Wesley.
  • Arendt, H. (1993 [1958]). La condición humana. Planeta.
  • Arendt, H. (1974). Los orígenes del totalitarismo. Madrid: Taurus.
  • Bakan, A. & Stasiulis, D. (2003). Negotiating Citizenship Migrant Women in Canada and the Global System (1era ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286924.
  • Barrett, M. (2013). Interculturalism and multiculturalism: Concepts and controversies.En M. Barrett (Ed.), Interculturalism and Multiculturalism: Similarities and Differences (pp.15-41). Council of Europe.
  • Basch, L. G., Glick, N. & Szanton, C. (1994). Nations Unbound : Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Gordon and Breach. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203347003.
  • Beck, U. (2006). The Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity.
  • Berry, J. (2016). Diversity and Equity. Cross cultural management, 23 (3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2016-0085.
  • Berry, J. (2017). Introduction to Mutual Intercultural Relations. En J. Berry (Ed.), Mutual Intercultural Relations (Culture and Psychology) (pp. XXXIII-XXXIV). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032.001
  • Benhabib, S. (2006 [2002]). Las reivindicaciones de la cultura. Igualdad y diversidad en la era global. Katz Editores.
  • Bloomfield, J. & Bianchini, F. (2004). Planning for the Intercultural City. Comedia.
  • Bouchard, G, (2011). What is Interculturalism? McGill Law Journal, 56 (2), 395–468. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/2710852-Bouchard_e.pdf
  • Bouchard, G. & Taylor, C. (2008). Building the Future: A Time for reconciliation. Gouvernement du Quebec. https://www.deslibris.ca/ID/213094
  • Bouchard, G. (2018). Interculturalism : A View from Quebec. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442669109.
  • Brown, W. (2016). Sacrificial Citizenship: Neoliberalism, Human Capital, and Austerity Politics. Constellations, 23 (1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12166.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Merely Cultural. Social Text, 52/53, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/466744
  • Caldwell, G. (2001). La culture publique commune. Les règles du jeu de la vie publique au Québec et les fondements de ces règles. Éditions Nota Bene.
  • Cohen, J. (1995). Critical social theory and feminist critiques: the debate with Jürgen Habermas. En J. Landes y J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse (pp. 57-90). Routledge.
  • Cantle, T. (2012). Interculturalism – The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cantle, T. (2013). Interculturalism as a new narrative for the era of globalisation and super-diversity. En M. Barrett (Ed.), Interculturalism and multiculturalism: Similarities and differences (pp. 69-93). Council of Europe.
  • Cantle, T. (2015). Interculturalism: “Learning to Live in Diversity''. En M. Antonisch (Ed.), Interculturalism versus Multiculturalism —The Cantle-Modood Debate. Ethnicities, pp. 2-10. https://doi.org/1177/1468796815604558
  • Cantle, T. (2016). The Case for Interculturalism, Plural Identities and Cohesion. En N. Meer, T. Modood y R. Zapata-Barrero (eds), Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474407083.003.0006
  • Consejo de Europa (2008). White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue “Living Together As Equals in Dignity”, editorial CE, https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/intercultural/source/white%20paper_final_revised_en.pdf
  • Consejo de Europa (2016). Intercultural City: Governance and Policies for Diverse Communities, editorial CE, https://edoc.coe.int/en/living-together-diversity-and-freedom-in-europe/6909-intercultural-cities-governance-and-policies-for-diverse-communities.html
  • Castles, S. & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and Migration : Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. Macmillan.
  • Delgado, M. (1999). El animal público. Hacía una antropología de los espacios urbanos (1era ed.). Anagrama.
  • Delgado, M. (2007). Sociedades movedizas. Pasos hacia una antropología de las calles (1era ed.). Anagrama.
  • Delgado, M. (2011). El espacio público como ideología. Libros de la Catarata.
  • Delgado, M. & Malet, D. (2007). El espacio público como ideología. Universidad de la Rioja.
  • Eagly, A. H. & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the Problem? Prejudice as an Attitude-in-Context. En J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick y L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Elias, A. & Mansouri, F. (2020). A Systematic Review of Studies on Interculturalism and Intercultural Dialogue. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 41:4, 490-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2020.1782861
  • Escandell, X. & Ceobanu, A. M. (2009). When contact with immigrants matters: threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain 's Comunidades Autónomas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701846924
  • Faist, T. (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism: What kind of dance partners? En R. Bauböck y T. Faist (Eds.), Diaspora and transnationalism. Concepts, theories and methods. Amsterdam University Press.
  • Fossum, J., Kastoryano, R., Modood, T. & Zapata-Barrero, R. (2020). Governing Diversity in Europe’s Plural Spaces: A Path to New Normativities. GRITIM-UPF Working Paper Series, 46, Winter.http://hdl.handle.net/10230/45565
  • Foucault, M. (1990 [1966]). Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Gallimard.
  • Foucault, M. (1978). Espacios otros: utopías y heterotopías. Carrer de la ciutat, 1.http://hdl.handle.net/2099/425
  • Fraser, N. (1995). What's critical about critical theory?: The case of Habermas and gender. En N. Tuana y R. Putnam (Ed.), Feminism and philosophy: Essential readings in theory, reinterpretation, and application (pp. 272-298). Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. (1999). Repensando la esfera pública: una contribución a la crítica de la democracia actualmente existente. Revista Ecuador Debate, 46, abril, 139-173. http://hdl.handle.net/10469/5760
  • Fraser, N. (2012 [2008]). Escalas de Justicia. Herder.
  • Fraser, N. & Honneth, A. (2003/2006). ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento? Un debate político filosófico. Morata.
  • Fraser, N., Urbieta, R. & Navarro, F. (2016). The battle for neoliberal hegemony: An interview with Nancy Fraser / Entrevistada por R. Urbieta y F. Navarro. Open Democracy, enero, 19. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/battle-for-neoliberal-hegemony/
  • Ghosh, R. (2011). The Liberating Potential of Multiculturalism in Canada. Ideals and realities Canadian issues, Spring, 3–8. https://acs-metropolis.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/R6BPxvD3PvAemyZ6BeEB.pdf
  • Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1ª ed.). Anchor Books.
  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relation in Public (1era ed.). Basic Books.
  • Goheen, P. (1998). Public space and geography of the modern city. Progress in Human Geography, 22 (4), 479-496. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298672729084
  • Goikoetxea, J. (2009). La práctica de la incomunicación o el conflicto discursivo[Tesis doctoral, Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea]. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmck36b2
  • Goikoetxea, J. (2018). Privatizar la democracia: capitalismo global, política europea y Estado español. Icaria.
  • Gomà, R. & Ubasart, G. (2021). Vidas en transición. (Re)construir la ciudadanía social (1era ed.). Tecnos.
  • Grad, H. (2017). Intercultural Relations in Spain. En J. Berry (Ed.), Mutual Intercultural Relations (Culture and Psychology) (pp. 249-267). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032.013
  • Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Polity Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996/1999). La inclusión del otro: estudios de teoría política. Paidós.
  • Harvey, D. (1990). Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80, 3, 418-434. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2563621
  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (1era ed.). Blackwell.
  • Held, D. (2002). Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits. En D. Held y A. McGrew (Ed.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance (pp. 305-325). Cambridge Polity Press.
  • Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002001
  • Innerarity, D. (2009). Políticas del reconocimiento. Hermes. pentsamendu eta historia aldizkaria, 30, 4-12. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3004325.pdf
  • Isin E. & Turner B. (2002). Handbook of Citizenship Studies. SAGE.
  • Jackman, M. R. (2005). Rejection or Inclusion of Outgroups?. En J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick y L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 89–105). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Joppke, C. (2018). War of words: interculturalism v. multiculturalism. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 11. https://comparativemigrationstudies.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40878-018-0079-1
  • Kastoryano, R. (2018). Multiculturalism and interculturalism: redefining nationhood and solidarity. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0082-6
  • Kenworthy, J. B., Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M. & Voci, A. (2005). Intergroup Contact: When Does it Work, and Why?. En J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick y L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 278–292). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights (1era ed.). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198290918.001.0001
  • Labelle, M. (2008). De la culture publique commune à la citoyenneté : ancrages historiques et enjeux contemporains. En S. Gervais, D. Karmis y D. Lamoureux (Dir.), Du tricoté serré au métissé serré ? La culture publique commune au Québec en débats (p. 19-43). Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
  • Labelle, M. (2015). Multiculturalisme, interculturalisme, antiracisme: le traitement de l’altérité. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 31, 2, 31-53. https://doi.org/ 10.4000/remi.7255
  • Lefebvre, Henri (1974). La production de l’espace. Anthropos.
  • Levrau, F. & Loobuyck, P. (2018). Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8
  • Levrau, F., & Loobuyck, P. (2018). Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0080-8
  • Lladonosa, M. & Öztürk, Ö. (2021). Una aproximació a la qüestió de les identitats en perspectiva nacional i de classe. Centre de documentació i pensament Serra i Puig.
  • Mansilla, J. (2021). La pandemia de la desigualdad. Bellaterra Edicions.
  • Massey, D. (2005). For Space. SAGE.
  • Mavelli, L. (2022). The creative destruction of citizenship. Neoliberal Citizenship: Sacred Markets, Sacrificial Lives. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857583.003.0002
  • McCarthy, T. (1981/1992). La teoría crítica de Jürgen Habermas. Tecnos.
  • Meer, N. & Modood, T. (2012). How does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism?. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33:2: 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2011.618266
  • Modood, T. (2017). Must Interculturalists misrepresent multiculturalism? Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0058-y
  • Pàmies, J., Carrasco, S., Pinyol, G., Riera, N., Mesas, A., Sánchez Martí, A. & Caravaca Hernández, A. (2020). Vers una identitat col·lectiva pluricultural. EMIGRA – CER Migracions, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/estudis/2020/d5d6b205b9a8/IDCOL_a2020.pdf
  • Parekh, B. (2001). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Ethnicities, 1(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879680100100112
  • Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U. y Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
  • Phipps, A. (2014). ‘They are bombing now’: ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in times of conflict. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.866127
  • Putman, R. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century – The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 2, 137-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  • Robinson, J. W. & Preston, J. D. (1976). Equal-Status Contact and Modification of Racial Prejudice: A Reexamination of the Contact Hypothesis. Social Forces, 54(4), 911–924. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576183
  • Rocher, F. (2015). Interculturalism in Montréal and Barcelona.En R. Zapata-Barrero (Ed.). Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation (pp. 35–52). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Rudman, L. A. (2005). Rejection of Women? Beyond Prejudice as Antipathy. En J. Dovidio, P. Glick, y L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 106–120). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Salée, D. (2007). The Quebec State and the Management of Ethnocultural Diversity: Perspectives on an Ambiguous Record. En K. Banting, T. J. Courchene i F. L. Seidle (Dir.), Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada (p. 105-142). Institut de recherche en politiques publiques.
  • Salée, D. (2010). Penser l’aménagement de la diversité ethnoculturelle au Québec: mythes, limites et possibles de l’interculturalisme. Politique et Sociétés, 29, 1, p. 145–180. https://doi.org/10.7202/039959ar
  • Staeheli, L. A. & Mitchell, D. (2007). Locating the public in research and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 792-811. 10.1177/0309132507083509
  • Susen, S. (2011). Critical Notes on Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Sociological Analysis, 5(1), 37-62. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2043824
  • Taylor, C. (1994). The Politics of Recognition. En A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (pp.25-73). Princeton University Press.
  • Tully, James (1995). Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (1era ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
  • Wieviorka, M. (2012). Multiculturalism: A concept to be redefined and certainly not replaced by the extremely vague term of interculturalism. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2012.649530
  • Wood, P. & Landry, C. (2008). The intercultural city. Planning for diversity advantage. Earthscan.
  • Yogeeswaran, K., Verkuyten, M. & Ealam, B. (2021). A way forward? The impact of interculturalism on intergroup relations in culturally diverse nations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(6), 945-965.https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220918651
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University.
  • Yuval-Davis N. (1999). The 'Multi-Layered Citizen'. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1:1, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/146167499360068
  • Yuval‐Davis, N. (2007). Intersectionality, citizenship and contemporary politics of belonging. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 10(4), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230701660220
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging : Intersectional Contestations. Sage.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2016). Power, intersectionality and the politics of belonging. En W. Harcourt (Ed.). The Palgrave handbook of gender and development (pp. 367-381). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2017). Recognition, intersectionality and transversal politics. En Y. Meital y P. Rayman (Ed.), Recognition as Key for Reconciliation: Israel, Palestine, and Beyond (pp. 157-167). Brill.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2004). Inmigración, innovación política y cultura de acomodación en España (1era ed.). CIDOB.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2013).The three strands of intercultural policies: a comprehensive view. A critical review of Bouchard and Cantle recent books on interculturalism. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/20970
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2015a). Interculturalism: Main Hypothesis,Theories and Strands. En R. Zapata (Ed.), Interculturalism in cities: concept, policy and implementation (pp. 3–19). Edward-Elgar Publishing.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2015b). Introduction: framing the intercultural turn. In Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation (pp. viii–xvi). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2016). Exploring the Foundations of the Intercultural Policy Paradigm: A Comprehensive Approach. Identities, 23 (2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2015.1006523
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2017a). Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defense. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0057-z
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2017b). The intercultural turn in Europe: process of policy paradigm change and formation. En F. Mansouri (Ed.), Interculturalism at the crossroads: Comparative perspectives on concepts, policies and practices (pp. 169–190). UNESCO Publishing.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2018). Rejoinder: multiculturalism and interculturalism: alongside but separate. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0090-6
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2020). Republicanism, diversity and public space in contemporary political theory: the normative basis of intercultural citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 24:8, 1066-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1769028
  • Zapata, R. (2021a). Construir interculturalidad: ciudadanía en entornos de diversidad y espacio público. En R. Gomà i G. Ubasart (Ed.), Vidas en transición. (Re)construir la ciudadanía social (pp. 213-230). Tecnos.
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. (2021b). Republicanism, diversity and public space in contemporary political theory: the normative basis of intercultural citizenship, Citizenship Studies, 24:8, 1066-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1769028
  • Zapata-Barrero, R. & Mansouri, F. (2022). A Multi-scale Approach to Interculturalism: From Globalised Politics to Localised Policy and Practice. Int. Migration & Integration 23, 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00846-w
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet