Videoanálisis de indagaciones científicas en la formación inicial docenteidentificación de T-patterns

  1. Maria Carme Peguera-Carré
  2. Andreu Curto-Reverte
  3. Jordi L. Coiduras-Rodríquez
Revista:
Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

ISSN: 1133-8482

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 67

Páginas: 123-153

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

Resumen

La observación en la formación inicial de docentes se ha visto favorecida con la proliferación de herramientas digitales para el análisis de la actuación en el aula, junto a las prestaciones introducidas en el software para tratamientos más complejos de los datos. La literatura refiere la eficacia de las prácticas de videoanálisis en la transmisión y adquisición del conocimiento pedagógico. En este estudio pre-experimental se presentan los resultados de un proceso formativo basado en la observación y análisis de secuencias videográficas sobre indagación científica y su enseñanza en educación primaria. Los registros audiovisuales de treinta estudiantes del grado de educación primaria conduciendo sesiones de ciencias experimentales, antes y después del proceso formativo, muestran en el análisis estadístico y en los T-patterns una mejora en la apropiación de modelos didácticos basados en la indagación. Los docentes en formación inicial transitan desde una primera actuación basada en demostraciones científicas guiadas a una intervención posterior estructurada bajo planteamientos característicos de la práctica de investigación, con una mayor diversidad y movilización de las habilidades científicas acompañadas de ayudas pedagógicas

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alles, M., Seidel, T., & Gröschner, A. (2019). Establishing a positive learning atmosphere and conversation culture in the context of a video-based teacher learning community. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1430049
  • Alpert, F. & Hodkinson, C. S. (2019). Video use in lecture classes: Current practices, student perceptions and preferences. Education and Training, 61(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2017-0185
  • Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, Á., Hernández-Mendo, A., & Losada, J. L. (2011). Diseños observacionales: ajuste y aplicación en psicología del deporte. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 11(2), 63–76. https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/133241
  • Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J. L., & Sánchez-Algarra, P. (2020). Integración de elementos cualitativos y cuantitativos en metodología observacional. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 49, 49–70. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2020.i49.04
  • Blikstad‐Balas, M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2015). Researching literacy in context: using video analysis to explore school literacies. Literacy, 49(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12037
  • Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Gamoran Sherin, M., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8021
  • Cebrián-Robles, D. (2022). CoAnnotation. https://coannotation.com/
  • Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). Teacher noticing in science education: do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755803
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Colomo-Magaña, E., Gabarda-Méndez, V., Cívico-Ariza, A., & Cuevas-Monzonís, N. (2020). Percepción de estudiantes sobre el uso del videoblog como recurso digital en educación superior. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 59, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.74358
  • Criswell, B., Krall, R., & Ringl, S. (2022). Video Analysis and Professional Noticing in the Wild of Real Science Teacher Education Classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(5), 531-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1966161
  • Durmaz, H., & Mutlu, S. (2016). The effect of an instructional intervention on elementary students’ science process skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00220671.2015.1118003
  • Exploratorium (2021). Magnet investigation. https://www.exploratorium.edu/education/ifi/inquiry-and-eld/educators-guide/magnet-investigation
  • García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
  • García-Fernández, M. D., & Benítez-Roca, M. V. (2000). Reconceptualización de la profesión docente mediante el empleo del vídeo. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 14, 77–82. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/pixel/article/view/61146
  • Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  • Goodwin, C. (2015). Professional Vision. In S. Reh, K. Berdelmann, & J. Dinkelaker (Eds.), Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 387-425). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19381-6_20
  • Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT education, 7(2), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.26220/REV.2042
  • Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2009). The teaching of science in primary schools. David Fulton Publishers.
  • Jewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research. NCRM Working Paper. National Center for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/
  • Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). Observation manuals as lenses to classroom teaching: Pitfalls and possibilities. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117703228
  • Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, 4th ed. Sage publications.
  • Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Effects of explicit instruction on the acquisition of students’ science inquiry skills in grades 5 and 6 of primary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1428777
  • Lazonder, A. W., & Egberink, A. (2014). Children’s acquisition and use of the control-of-variables strategy: effects of explicit and implicit instructional guidance. Instructional Science, 42(2), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-013-9284-3
  • Luna, M. J. (2018). What does it mean to notice my students’ ideas in science today? An investigation of elementary teachers’ practice of noticing their students’ thinking in science. Cognition and Instruction, 36(4), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1496919
  • Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200792
  • McDonald, S., Grimes, P., Doughty, L., Finlayson, O., McLoughlin, E., & van Kampen, P. (2019). A workshop approach to developing the professional pedagogical vision of Irish secondary preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(5), 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1583033
  • National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  • Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y
  • Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
  • Pattier, D., & Ferreira, P.D. (2022). El vídeo educativo en educación superior durante la pandèmia de la COVID-19. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 65, 183-208. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.93511
  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Constantinos, C.M., Zacharias, & C.Z., Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  • Richards, J., Altshuler, M., Sherin, B. L., Sherin, M. G., & Leatherwood, C. J. (2021). Complexities and opportunities in teachers' generation of videos from their own classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, Article 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100490
  • Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground–A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
  • Roth, K. J., Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Stuhlsatz, M. A., & Hvidsten, C. (2019). Comparing the effects of analysis-of-practice and content-based professional development on teacher and student outcomes in science. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1217–1253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218814759
  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Routledge.
  • Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., Ibáñez, M., & Coiduras Rodríguez, J. L. (2018). Análisis de la comunicación de experiencias indagadoras presentadas en congresos de ciencias dirigidos a alumnos de educación infantil y primaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 15(1), 1302. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i1.1302
  • Soto, A., Camerino, O., Iglesias, X., Castañer, M., & Anguera, M. T. (2021). LINCE PLUS software for systematic observational studies in sports and health. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01642-1
  • Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1989). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173698
  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational psychology review, 22(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004
  • Vogt, F., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). Assessing Biology Pre-Service Teachers’ Professional Vision of Teaching Scientific Inquiry. Education Sciences, 10(11), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110332
  • Zaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Hiebert, J. (2021). Exploring preservice teachers’ abilities to connect professional knowledge with lesson planning and observation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1996558
  • Zummo, L., Hauser, M., & Carlson, J. (2021). Science Teacher Noticing via Video Annotation: Links between Complexity and Knowledge-Based Reasoning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(7),1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1989645
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet