La evaluación en línea en el punto de miraUn estudio de caso en la universidad española

  1. Marín, Victoria 1
  2. Coiduras, Jordi 1
  3. Brescó, Enric 1
  4. Carrera, Xavier 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Lleida
    info

    Universitat de Lleida

    Lleida, España

    ROR https://ror.org/050c3cw24

Journal:
Revista Electrónica Educare

ISSN: 1409-4258

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 28

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15359/REE.28-1.18426 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista Electrónica Educare

Abstract

Objective. This exploratory case study aims to analyze the attitudes, practices and preferences of higher education faculty and students in relation to online assessment. Methodology. A quantitative methodology based on a questionnaire was used, and a descriptive and correlational analysis was conducted. Participants included students and faculty members from a Spanish on-site university. Results. Certain similarities and differences in attitudes, practices and preferences between students and teachers are presented. Some relationships, albeit weak, were also identified between the online assessment practices used and some characteristics of the teachers’ profile or teaching (teaching experience, teaching load and class size). Conclusions. The findings show that a large part of the teaching staff shows some reluctance in the design and implementation of online assessment strategies beyond traditional exams, as well as a great concern about student control and the danger of fraud. On the other hand, students show generally more positive attitudes towards online assessment than the teaching staff. The recommendations point to the consideration of the role of institutional support and teacher training units for the improvement of teachers’ digital competence in relation to online assessment, the importance of updating security systems in technical infrastructures, and adjusting the effects of teaching load and class size when online assessment is applied.

Bibliographic References

  • Abella García, V., Grande de Prado, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell Almuzara, A. (2020). Guía de recomendaciones para la evaluación online en las universidades públicas de Castilla y León (versión 1.1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3780661
  • Aznarte, J. L., Melendos Pardo, M., & Lacruz López, J. M. (2022). Sobre el uso de tecnologías de reconocimiento facial en la universidad: El caso de la UNED. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(1), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.31533
  • Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I, & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (18), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  • Brady, M., Devitt, A., & Kiersey, R. A. (2019). Perspectivas del personal académico sobre la tecnología para la evaluación (TfA) en la educación superior: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura, 50(6), 3080-3098. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12742
  • Coghlan, S., Miller, T., & Paterson, J. (2021). Good proctor or “Big Brother”? Ethics of online exam supervision technologies. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1581-1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00476-1
  • Conrad, D. & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. AU Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01
  • Dominguez-Figaredo, D., Gil-Jaurena, I., & Morentin-Encina, J. (2022). The impact of rapid adoption of online assessment on students’ performance and perceptions: evidence from a distance learning university. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(3), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2399
  • Espasa, A., Mayordomo, R. M., Guasch, T., & Martinez-Melo, M. (2022). Does the type of feedback channel used in online learning environments matter? Students’ perceptions and impact on learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419891307
  • Fernández March, A. (2010). La evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en un modelo de formación por competencias en la educación universitaria. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2010.6216
  • García Aretio, L. (2021). ¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande, M. (2020). La evaluación online en la educación superior en tiempos de la COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 21, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23013
  • Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
  • Gros Salvat, B. G., & Cano García, E. (2021). Procesos de feedback para fomentar la autorregulación con soporte tecnológico en la educación superior: Revisión sistemática. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28886
  • Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w
  • Hattie, J. (2009). The black box of tertiary assessment: An impending revolution. En L. H. Meyer, S. Davidson, H. Anderson, P. M. Fletcher, P. M. Johnston, & M. Rees (Eds.), Tertiary assessment & higher education student outcomes: Policy, practice & research (pp. 259-275). Ako Aotearoa.
  • Heil, J. & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 27(1), 187-218. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398
  • Hilliger, I., Ruipérez‐Valiente, J. A., Alexandron, G., & Gašević, D. (2022). Trustworthy remote assessments: A typology of pedagogical and technological strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1507-1520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12755
  • Ibarra Sáiz, M. S. & Rodríguez Gómez, G. (2010). Los procedimientos de evaluación como elementos de desarrollo de la función orientadora en la universidad. REOP - Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 21(2), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.21.num.2.2010.11558
  • Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2022). El papel de la autoevaluación y la evaluación entre pares en la educación superior. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
  • Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences, 9(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i9.504
  • Kondakci, Y., Capa-Aydin, Y., Zayim-Kurtay, M., & Kaya-Kasikci, S. (2022). Framework and taxonomy development of online assessment [Report on IO1]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7009967
  • Mâță, L., Poenaru, A.-G., & Boghian, I. (2022). Current issues of ethical use of information technology from the perspective of university teachers. En L. Mâță (Ed.), Ethical use of information technology in higher education (pp. 163-179). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1951-9_1
  • Marín, V. I., & Pérez Garcias, A. (2016). Collaborative e-assessment as a strategy for scaffolding self-regulated learning in higher education. En S. Caballé & R. Clarisó (Eds), Formative assessment, learning data analytics and gamification (pp. 3-24). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803637-2.00001-4
  • Marín, V. I., & Salinas, J. (2022). Balance between guidance and self-regulated learning: Teaching and learning strategies in online, Hybrid and blended learning in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.770
  • Marín, V. I., Bedenlier, S., Capa-Aydin, Y., Kaya-Kasikci, S., Kondakci, Y., Schieber, J., & Zayim-Kurtay, M. (2022). Apoyo al profesorado para la implementación de la evaluación en línea en educación superior: El proyecto europeo Remote.EDU. En S. Olmos-Migueláñez, M. J. Rodríguez-Conde, A. Bartolomé, J. Salinas, F. J. Frutos-Esteban, & F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), La influencia de la tecnología en la investigación educativa pospandemia (pp. 183-198). Octaedro.
  • Marín, V. I., Brescó, E., Carrera, X., Coiduras, J., & Alfonso, G. (2022). Evaluation study of stakeholder perspectives on online assessment [Report on IO2]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7010090
  • Natal, D. (1998). On-line assessment: What, Why, How. Technology Education Conference. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED419552.pdf
  • Or, C. & Chapman, E. (2022). Development and acceptance of online assessment in higher education: Recommendations for further research. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 5(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2022.5.1.6
  • Panadero, E. & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
  • Panadero, E., Fraile, J., & García-Pérez, D. (2022). Transition to higher education and assessment: A one year longitudinal study. Educación XX1, 25(2), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.29870
  • Redecker, C. (2013). The use of ICT for the assessment of key competences. Publications Office of The European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/87007
  • Senadheera, P. & Kulasekara, G. U. (2022). A formative assessment design suitable for online learning environments and its impact on students’ learning. Open Praxis, 13(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.13.4.261
  • Şenel, S. & Şenel, H. C. (2021). Remote assessment in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.820140
  • Surahman, E. & Wang, T.-H. (2022). Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1535-1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12708
  • Vega-Angulo, H. E., Rozo-García, H., & Dávila-Gilede, J. (2021). Estrategias de evaluación mediadas por las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC): Una revisión de bibliografía. Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(2), 1-22. http://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-2.16
  • Winstone, N. & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Data source: Dialnet